The evolution of Companies act 1956 to 2013

Companies act

Overview of Companies Act:

The Companies Act, 1956 was an important legislation governing companies in India until it was replaced by the Companies Act, 2013. The Companies Act, 1956 was in force for several decades and underwent various amendments over the years. The Companies Act 2013 is a comprehensive legislation in India that governs the formation, management, and operations of companies. The current Companies Act has been amended multiple times to address emerging needs and promote ease of doing business.

Important components of the new companies act:

  • Types of Companies: The Act recognizes various types of companies, including private companies, public companies, one-person companies (OPCs), and different categories of companies based on their size and turnover.
  • Incorporation and Registration: The Act outlines the process and requirements for incorporating a company, including the documents required, such as the Memorandum of Association (MoA) and Articles of Association (AoA). It also provides for the reservation of a unique name for the company and the issuance of a certificate of incorporation.
  • Share Capital and Shareholders: The Act regulates the issuance, transfer, and buyback of shares, as well as the rights and obligations of shareholders. It provides guidelines for issuing different types of shares, such as equity shares, preference shares, and debentures.
  • Board of Directors and Management: The Act defines the roles, powers, and responsibilities of directors, including their appointment, qualifications, and remuneration. It outlines the duties and liabilities of directors and establishes guidelines for board meetings, committees, and corporate governance practices.
  • Annual General Meetings and Financial Reporting: The Act mandates that every company should hold an Annual General Meeting (AGM) to present financial statements, appoint auditors, and address important matters. It sets out the requirements for maintaining proper books of accounts, conducting audits, and filing financial statements with regulatory authorities.
  • Corporate Governance and Compliance: The Act focuses on promoting good corporate governance practices and transparency in company operations. It establishes guidelines for related-party transactions, insider trading, prevention of oppression and mismanagement, and protection of minority shareholders’ interests. The Act also establishes regulatory bodies, such as the Ministry of Corporate Affairs, the Registrar of Companies, and the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT), for overseeing and enforcing company law provisions.
  • Winding up and Insolvency: The Act provides provisions for voluntary winding up and compulsory winding up of companies. It also addresses matters related to insolvency, bankruptcy, and the resolution of distressed companies through the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016

Need for companies act, 2013:

The Companies Act, 2013 was enacted in India to replace the Companies Act, 1956, with the aim of modernizing and enhancing corporate governance practices, promoting ease of doing business, and addressing emerging challenges in the corporate sector. Several factors contributed to the need for a new Companies Act in 2013. Some of them are:

  1. Alignment with International Practices: The Companies Act, 1956 was outdated and did not align with international best practices in corporate governance and regulation. The new Companies Act, 2013 was introduced to bring Indian company law in line with global standards and improve investor confidence.
  2. Enhancing Corporate Governance: The new Act introduced several provisions to strengthen corporate governance practices, such as the establishment of independent directors, mandatory audit committees, and enhanced disclosure requirements. These measures aimed to ensure transparency, accountability, and fairness in company operations.
  3. Promoting Investor Protection: The Companies Act, 2013 emphasized the protection of investors’ rights and interests. It introduced provisions to safeguard minority shareholders, regulate related-party transactions, and enhance corporate social responsibility (CSR) obligations. These measures aimed to build trust and confidence among investors.
  4. Simplifying Business Processes: The Companies Act, 2013 aimed to streamline and simplify various processes involved in company formation, compliance, and winding up. It introduced provisions for online filing, reduced paperwork, and faster approvals, which contributed to improving the ease of doing business in India.
  5. Addressing Emerging Challenges: The new Act addressed emerging challenges in the corporate sector, such as the need for better regulation of corporate fraud, prevention of money laundering, and effective resolution of insolvency and bankruptcy cases. It provided a framework to deal with these issues and protect the interests of stakeholders.
  6. Promoting Social Responsibility: The Companies Act, 2013 emphasized the concept of corporate social responsibility (CSR) by mandating certain companies to spend a specified percentage of their profits on social and environmental initiatives. This provision aimed to encourage businesses to contribute positively to society.
  7. Strengthening Regulatory Framework: The Companies Act, 2013 introduced regulatory bodies like the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) and the Serious Fraud Investigation Office (SFIO) to enhance the effectiveness of corporate regulation and enforcement. It aimed to ensure better compliance and faster resolution of disputes.

Overall, the Companies Act, 2013 was introduced to modernize company law in India, enhance corporate governance, protect investor interests, simplify business processes, and address emerging challenges. It has played a crucial role in transforming the corporate landscape in India and promoting a more transparent and accountable business environment.

Landmark cases:

  • Satyam Scandal (Satyam Computer Services Limited): One of the most prominent cases under the Companies Act, 2013 was the Satyam scandal. In 2009, it was revealed that the management of Satyam Computer Services had engaged in accounting fraud, leading to a massive corporate scandal. The case highlighted the importance of corporate governance, auditing, and the need for stricter regulations to prevent such frauds. The Serious Fraud Investigation Office (SFIO) played a significant role in investigating the case.
  • Tata-Mistry Dispute (Cyrus Mistry v. Tata Sons Limited): This high-profile case involved a legal battle between Cyrus Mistry, the former Chairman of Tata Sons, and the Tata Group. Cyrus Mistry was removed as Chairman in 2016, leading to a dispute over corporate governance issues and allegations of mismanagement. The case brought attention to corporate governance practices, boardroom battles, and the fiduciary duties of directors.
  • Sahara Group Case (Sahara India Real Estate Corporation Limited and Sahara Housing Investment Corporation Limited): The Sahara Group case involved allegations of non-compliance with regulations related to raising funds from the public. The Supreme Court of India, in its judgment, highlighted the importance of investor protection, transparency, and the need for strict adherence to regulatory provisions under the Companies Act, 2013.
  • IL&FS Case (Infrastructure Leasing & Financial Services Limited): IL&FS was a major infrastructure financing and development company that faced financial difficulties in 2018. The case shed light on corporate governance failures, mismanagement, and regulatory oversight. The government intervened, and the case led to reforms in the infrastructure financing sector, highlighting the need for better regulation and supervision.
  • SEBI-Sahara Case (Sahara India Real Estate Corporation Limited and Sahara Housing Investment Corporation Limited): This case involved a dispute between the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) and the Sahara Group regarding the refund of funds raised from investors. The Supreme Court played a significant role in the resolution of the case and emphasized the importance of investor protection, compliance with regulations, and the role of SEBI in regulating securities markets.

Conclusion:

The Companies Act, 2013 has played a pivotal role in modernizing corporate governance practices, promoting investor protection, simplifying business processes, establishing an effective insolvency framework, strengthening regulatory oversight, and encouraging responsible business conduct. It has brought about significant changes in the Indian corporate sector, contributing to its growth, transparency, and sustainability.

Frequently Asked Questions(FAQ'S)

The Companies Act, 1956 primarily regulates the formation, financing, functioning and winding up of companies. The Act prescribes regulatory mechanism regarding all relevant aspects including organisational, financial and managerial aspects of companies.

As per the companies act, 2013, a single person can form a company whereas, under the 1956 act, a single person could not form a company. Secondly, as per 2013 act, the maximum number of persons allowed in a private company is 200, whereas, as per 1956 act, the maximum number of persons allowed in a private company is 50. The 2013 act recognises the electronic mode of sending documents to the company, which the 1956 act did not. Also, as per the 2013 act, it is not compulsory to transfer profits to the reserves of the company, which was earlier compulsory under the 1956 act. Lastly, under the 2013 act, the maximum number of directors in public and private companies is 15, while under the 1956 act, it was 12.

No. It was repealed and replaced by the Companies Act 2013.

The 1956 act had 13 parts having 658 sections, along with 15 schedules where as Companies Act 2013 has been divided into 29 chapters along with 470 sections and 7 schedules.

24 amendments took place in the companies act since 1956.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Posts

Recent Posts